Watanabe, Taiji (2010) Judicial integrity and dissenting court opinion. Pandora's Box, 1 (2010). pp. 17-20. ISSN 1835-8624
Official URL: http://www.jatl.org
Abstract
The paper examines a political role of judicial decisions and descending opinions. Writing of dissenting opinions is not a universal rule. A judge may dissent but not necessary write a dissenting opinion. Dissenting opinions are distinguished from an act of dissent that a judge is in disagreement with the majority of the court, in that dissenting opinions necessitate the formulation of disagreement and presentation of reasons.
|
Statistics for this ePrint Item |
| Item Type: | Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C) |
|---|---|
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Item Status: | Live Archive |
| Additional Information: | 4363460. Permanent restricted access to chapter due to publisher's copyright restrictions. |
| Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: | Historic - Faculty of Business - School of Accounting, Economics and Finance (1 Apr 2007 - 31 Dec 2010) |
| Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: | Historic - Faculty of Business - School of Accounting, Economics and Finance (1 Apr 2007 - 31 Dec 2010) |
| Date Deposited: | 20 Jan 2011 12:01 |
| Last Modified: | 06 Jan 2015 05:06 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | judicial decisions, dissenting opinions, political role |
| Fields of Research (2008): | 18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180119 Law and Society |
| Fields of Research (2020): | 48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES > 4804 Law in context > 480499 Law in context not elsewhere classified |
| Socio-Economic Objectives (2008): | C Society > 94 Law, Politics and Community Services > 9499 Other Law, Politics and Community Services > 949999 Law, Politics and Community Services not elsewhere classified C Society > 94 Law, Politics and Community Services > 9404 Justice and the Law > 940406 Legal Processes |
| URI: | http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/9323 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Archive Repository Staff Only |