Forum non conveniens in Australia: a comparative analysis

Gray, Anthony (2009) Forum non conveniens in Australia: a comparative analysis. Common Law World Review, 38 (3). pp. 207-244. ISSN 1473-7795

Preview

PDF (Published Version ) Gray_CLWR_v38n3_PV.pdf Download (155kB)

Abstract

This paper explores the doctrine of forum non conveniens and its use throughout the common law world by a court to refuse to exercise jurisdiction that is otherwise properly enacted. It considers that the current Australian law, which focuses on a 'clearly inappropriate forum' test, is out of step with other common law jurisdictions, and that the Australian law in this area should be reformed. Such an approach is anachronistic in a globalised market for legal services, tends to reward forum shoppers, and is inconsistent with the High Court of Australia's development of choice of law rules in recent years.

Statistics for this ePrint Item

Item Type:	Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)
Refereed:	Yes
Item Status:	Live Archive
Additional Information:	Published version deposited in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher (Vathek Publishing).
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre:	Historic - Faculty of Business - School of Law (1 Apr 2007 - 31 Dec 2010)
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre:	Historic - Faculty of Business - School of Law (1 Apr 2007 - 31 Dec 2010)
Date Deposited:	01 Apr 2010 01:25
Last Modified:	07 Jul 2014 05:13
Uncontrolled Keywords:	forum non conveniens, Voth, Spiliada, Oceanic, International Shoe, Gulf Oil, clearly inappropriate forum, more appropriate forum
Fields of Research (2008):	18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180107 Conflict of Laws (Private International Law)
Socio-Economic Objectives (2008):	C Society > 94 Law, Politics and Community Services > 9404 Justice and the Law > 940406 Legal Processes
URI:	http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/6524

Actions (login required)

Archive Repository Staff Only