Maraseni, Tek Narayan (2009) Reforestation dynamics in the context of climate change in Australia: estimation of whole of farm emissions from primary industry in Australia. VDM Verlag Dr Muller, Saarbrucken, Germany. ISBN 978-3-639-18802-8
Land use change from forest to non-forest use is a major source of greenhouse gases in Australia. From 1996, the Queensland Government provided incentives for landholders to plant ex-pasture and cropping areas with hardwood plantations through the Southeast Queensland Regional Forest Agreement program. Spotted gum (Corymbia citriodora subspecies Variegata) was a target hardwood species for Southeast Queensland (SEQ); however, the long-term viability of timber-alone plantations relative to cropping and livestock production, in the medium to low rainfall areas of SEQ, and elsewhere in Australia, is questionable. Carbon credits resulting from additional carbon sequestration may change the relative profitability of these land uses. The aim of this research was to compare spotted gum plantations with peanut-maize cultivation and beef pasture in low rainfall areas, incorporating carbon values.
This study covers all variable costs and benefits, and different sources and sinks of three major greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide. For the case study of three land use systems (maize-peanut cropping, pasture, and spotted gum plantations in the Kingaroy district of SEQ), production, carbon sequestration and emissions data were supplemented by formal and informal interviews with landholders, agronomists, sawmill staff and government extension personnel. Forest inventory, biomass and soil sampling, and stakeholder interviews were used as sources of primary data. The costs and benefits of all land use systems were converted into monetary terms and discounted to produce net present values.
If the comparison of net present values is limited to traditional benefits (i.e. income from crops and hay in cultivation, beef in pasture and timber in plantation), cultivation is the most profitable option, followed by pasture and plantations. Even after the inclusion of beef value, plantations could not compete with other land use systems. After the inclusion of greenhouse gas value, plantations were the most profitable option, followed by pasture and cultivation. However, if the carbon price was reduced from the price assumed in this thesis of $10.5 t-1CO2e to $4.3 t-1CO2e, cultivation would remain the most profitable option.
If the currently used nominal (pre-text) discount rate (six percent) increased to seven or eight percent, the optimal rotation of plantation would reduce from 34 to 31 years and 29 years, respectively. At a seven percent discount rate, plantations would be a less profitable than pasture, but marginally more profitable than cultivation. If the discount rate were eight percent, plantations would be less profitable than both pasture and cultivation.
These findings have some implications for attempts to increase the plantation estate to three million hectares by 2020, through policy frameworks such as the Australian Government’s ‘Vision 2020’. Therefore, this study has recommended several measures to increase the benefits from plantations.
Statistics for this ePrint Item
|Item Type:||Book (Commonwealth Reporting Category A)|
|Item Status:||Live Archive|
|Additional Information:||Permanent restricted access to electronic version due to publisher copyright restrictions. Originally presented as a University of Southern Queensland PhD thesis, in 2007 - titled: Re-evaluating land use choices to incorporate carbon values: a case study in the South Burnett region of Queensland, Australia. Thesis available in USQ ePrints at: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/3655/.|
|Faculty / Department / School:||Historic - Faculty of Business - School of Accounting, Economics and Finance|
|Date Deposited:||16 Sep 2009 23:46|
|Last Modified:||12 Sep 2016 02:28|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||greehouse gas emissions; spotted gum; growth model; carbon sequestration; carbon trading|
|Fields of Research :||14 Economics > 1402 Applied Economics > 140201 Agricultural Economics
05 Environmental Sciences > 0503 Soil Sciences > 050301 Carbon Sequestration Science
07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences > 0705 Forestry Sciences > 070501 Agroforestry
|Socio-Economic Objective:||D Environment > 96 Environment > 9603 Climate and Climate Change > 960302 Climate Change Mitigation Strategies|
Actions (login required)
|Archive Repository Staff Only|