Ethics in negotiation and ADR - Legal Services Commissioner v Mullins

Mortensen, Reid (2007) Ethics in negotiation and ADR - Legal Services Commissioner v Mullins. Proctor, 27 (1). pp. 10-11. ISSN 1321-8794

Preview

PDF (Published Version) Mortensen_Proctor_v27n1_VoR.pdf Download (476kB)

Abstract

A barrister who failed to reveal his client's newly diagnosed cancer during alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for a personal injuries claim has learnt the hard way that lawyers must be consistently truthful in not only litigation but also mediation and other forms of ADR.

Statistics for this ePrint Item

Item Type:	Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)
Refereed:	Yes
Item Status:	Live Archive
Additional Information:	Version of Record deposited with blanket permission of publisher.
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre:	Historic - Faculty of Business - Department of Law (Up to 31 Mar 2007)
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre:	Historic - Faculty of Business - Department of Law (Up to 31 Mar 2007)
Date Deposited:	25 May 2009 02:36
Last Modified:	08 Dec 2014 23:50
Uncontrolled Keywords:	alternative dispute resolution; ADR; ethics
Fields of Research (2008):	18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180121 Legal Practice, Lawyering and the Legal Profession
Fields of Research (2020):	48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES > 4805 Legal systems > 480505 Legal practice, lawyering and the legal profession
URI:	http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/5024

Actions (login required)

Archive Repository Staff Only