Mortensen, Reid (2007) Ethics in negotiation and ADR - Legal Services Commissioner v Mullins. Proctor, 27 (1). pp. 10-11. ISSN 1321-8794
![]()
|
PDF (Published Version)
Mortensen_Proctor_v27n1_VoR.pdf Download (476kB) |
Official URL: http://www.qls.com.au/lwp/wcm/connect/QLS/Online+L...
Abstract
A barrister who failed to reveal his client's newly diagnosed cancer during alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for a personal injuries claim has learnt the hard way that lawyers must be consistently truthful in not only litigation but also mediation and other forms of ADR.
![]() |
Statistics for this ePrint Item |
Item Type: | Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C) |
---|---|
Refereed: | Yes |
Item Status: | Live Archive |
Additional Information: | Version of Record deposited with blanket permission of publisher. |
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: | Historic - Faculty of Business - Department of Law (Up to 31 Mar 2007) |
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: | Historic - Faculty of Business - Department of Law (Up to 31 Mar 2007) |
Date Deposited: | 25 May 2009 02:36 |
Last Modified: | 08 Dec 2014 23:50 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | alternative dispute resolution; ADR; ethics |
Fields of Research (2008): | 18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180121 Legal Practice, Lawyering and the Legal Profession |
URI: | http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/5024 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Archive Repository Staff Only |