Mortensen, Reid (2003) Autochthonous essential: state courts and a cooperative national scheme of civil jurisdiction. University of Tasmania Law Review, 22 (2). pp. 109-148. ISSN 0082-2108
Abstract
Through the 1980s and 1990s, Australian governments and courts developed a uniform scheme for the exercise of civil jurisdiction across the country. The twentieth century saw increasing recognition that within federal and complex political associations, there is generally a positive relationship between the ability of courts to enforce their judgments throughout a federal or transnational market area and its economic and social integration. However, a willingness to let courts' judgments 'circulate' freely over internal borders in a multistate area also suggests confidence that those courts exercise proportionate civil jurisdictions that are acceptable to all of its polities.
|
Statistics for this ePrint Item |
| Item Type: | Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C) |
|---|---|
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Item Status: | Live Archive |
| Additional Information: | Authors retain copyright. |
| Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: | Historic - Faculty of Business - Department of Law (Up to 31 Mar 2007) |
| Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: | Historic - Faculty of Business - Department of Law (Up to 31 Mar 2007) |
| Date Deposited: | 06 Apr 2009 05:04 |
| Last Modified: | 20 Nov 2013 02:50 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | state courts; national scheme; civil jurisdiction; Australia |
| Fields of Research (2008): | 18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180120 Legal Institutions (incl. Courts and Justice Systems) 16 Studies in Human Society > 1605 Policy and Administration > 160509 Public Administration 18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180104 Civil Law and Procedure |
| Socio-Economic Objectives (2008): | C Society > 94 Law, Politics and Community Services > 9404 Justice and the Law > 940406 Legal Processes |
| URI: | http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/5019 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Archive Repository Staff Only |