An observational study of nurses’ intravenous flush and medication practice in the clinical setting

Keogh, Samantha and Shelverton, Caroline and Flynn, Julie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1512-2089 and Davies, Karen and Marsh, Nicole and Rickard, Claire M. (2017) An observational study of nurses’ intravenous flush and medication practice in the clinical setting. Vascular Access, 3 (1). pp. 1-18. ISSN 2204-9762


Abstract

Introduction: Research has quantified the unacceptably high failure rate of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) prior to completion of prescribed treatment. Surveys and audits have highlighted inconsistencies in reported practice and guidelines. <br /><br /> Aim: The aim of this study was to gain a 'real world' overview of nurses' intravenous (IV) flushing and medication practice, and compare this to current practice recommendations. <br /><br /> Method: This was a single-centre, prospective observational study of IV flush and medication administration by nurses over a range of times on surgical and medical wards of a tertiary metropolitan hospital. <br /><br /> Results: Eighty-two nurses were observed in the study, yielding 82 sets of observations. Most observations were for PIVCs (n = 77; 93%) with modes of delivery divided between IV bolus (n = 28; 34%), IV medication in a bag (n = 36; 44%), and IV burette (n = 18; 22%). Pre and post drug administration flushes were delivered in all cases of bolus delivery; however, flushing practice was less consistent with other delivery modes. The majority (n = 56/61; 91%) of flushes used 10 mL syringes with 0.9% sodium chloride. Nearly a third of nurses were not fully compliant with hand hygiene (n = 36/82; 32%) or of aseptic non-touch technique (ANTT) (n = 27/82; 33%) in the preparation phase. However, needleless decontamination was conducted in 99% of cases. <br /><br /> Conclusion: Mixed forms of drug delivery were observed, with use of single bags predominating. This has implications for healthcare costs and infection control. Flushing practice was consistent for bolus delivery but inconsistent for bag and burette delivery. Adherence to hand hygiene and ANTT was also sub optimal. The limited studies on flushing practices to date are inhibiting recognition of this important patient quality and safety issue. Practice and guidelines need to be consistent with current best practice recommendations. Future studies need to minimise practice variation in trial protocol and/or acknowledge and account for varied practice with analysis.


Statistics for USQ ePrint 44668
Statistics for this ePrint Item
Item Type: Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)
Refereed: Yes
Item Status: Live Archive
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: No Faculty
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: No Faculty
Date Deposited: 15 Dec 2021 03:45
Last Modified: 22 Dec 2021 03:29
Uncontrolled Keywords: intravenous flush; clinical setting; peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs); nurses
Fields of Research (2008): 11 Medical and Health Sciences > 1110 Nursing > 111003 Clinical Nursing: Secondary (Acute Care)
11 Medical and Health Sciences > 1110 Nursing > 111099 Nursing not elsewhere classified
Fields of Research (2020): 42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4205 Nursing > 420506 Sub-acute care
42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4205 Nursing > 420501 Acute care
42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4205 Nursing > 420599 Nursing not elsewhere classified
Identification Number or DOI: https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.629496319613481
URI: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/44668

Actions (login required)

View Item Archive Repository Staff Only