A rationale for employing mixed methods design in doctoral research about female students academic achievement in secondary schools in Papua New Guinea

Dovona-Ope, Dinah R. (2008) A rationale for employing mixed methods design in doctoral research about female students academic achievement in secondary schools in Papua New Guinea. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 4 (2). pp. 59-67.

Text (Published Version)

Download (40Kb) | Preview


Contextual features and research problems are among some of the important factors that must be considered in making decisions about the most appropriate research design to employ in designing and undertaking doctoral research. In my doctoral research project, I was significantly influenced by a number of such issues in determining an appropriate research design. As the study focused on a problem confronting an under-represented group - female students - in a unique and complex context, mixed methods research design informed by the pragmatic and transformative-emancipatory theoretical positions (Creswell & Plano-Clark, 2007; Mertens, 2005a; Tashakkorri & Teddlie, 2003) was considered as providing the most appropriate design for my doctoral research project. Mixed methods research as a methodology was considered for its direct engagement in the complexity encountered by researchers in culturally diverse communities when work is focused on a social justice agenda (Creswell & Plano-Clark, 2007; Mertens, 2005a). It was also identified as embracing three underlying issues which were important to this study. These were: a focus on research outcomes through emphasis on the importance of the questions asked rather than the methods of data collection; a need to collect different voices from those living the experiences with an intention for advocacy; and a dedication to promoting social change as an outcome of the research. As a research design, mixed methods research was considered for its ability to incorporate both quantitative and qualitative data collection techniques. Thus two highly structured numerical survey questionnaires for data collection and analysis were used with a larger sample (de Vaus, 1995; Johnson & Christensen, 2004). Additionally, two sets of interview schedules and focus group schedules were used for data collection and analysis with smaller samples. These were set up for refinement, extension and explanation of specific quantitative findings such as statistical relationships and differences among groups, or unexpected results in the participants' own words (Creswell, 2002; Krueger, 2000; Silverman, 2006).

Statistics for USQ ePrint 4241
Statistics for this ePrint Item
Item Type: Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)
Refereed: Yes
Item Status: Live Archive
Additional Information: Published version deposited in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
Faculty / Department / School: Historic - Faculty of Education
Date Deposited: 18 Jul 2014 01:30
Last Modified: 18 Jul 2014 01:30
Uncontrolled Keywords: experiential learning; education and state; academic achievement; transformative learning; women; mixed methods research; dissertations
Fields of Research : 16 Studies in Human Society > 1608 Sociology > 160807 Sociological Methodology and Research Methods
16 Studies in Human Society > 1608 Sociology > 160809 Sociology of Education
13 Education > 1303 Specialist Studies in Education > 130308 Gender, Sexuality and Education
Socio-Economic Objective: E Expanding Knowledge > 97 Expanding Knowledge > 970113 Expanding Knowledge in Education
URI: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/4241

Actions (login required)

View Item Archive Repository Staff Only