Validation study of Polar V800 accelerometer

Hernandez-Vicente, Adrian and Santos-Lozano, Alejandro and De Cocker, Katrien and Garatachea, Nuria (2016) Validation study of Polar V800 accelerometer. Annals of Translational Medicine & Epidemiology, 4 (15):278. pp. 1-12.

[img]
Preview
Text (Published)
Hernandez_Vicente_etal_2016_AnnalsTranslationalResearch_PolarV800.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (665kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: The correct quantification of physical activity (PA) and energy expenditure (EE) in daily life is an important target for researchers and professionals. The objective of this paper is to study the validity of the Polar V800 for the quantification of PA and the estimation of EE against the ActiGraph (ActiTrainer) in healthy young adults.

Methods: Eighteen Caucasian active people (50% women) aged between 19–23 years wore an ActiTrainer on the right hip and a Polar V800 on the preferred wrist during 7 days. Paired samples t-tests were used to analyze differences in outcomes between devices, and Pearson’s correlation coefficients to examine the correlation between outcomes. The agreement was studied using the Bland-Altman method. Also, the association between the difference and the magnitude of the measurement (heteroscedasticity) was examined. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC value) were calculated to evaluate the ability of the devices to accurately define a person who fulfills the recommendation of 10,000 daily steps.

Results: The devices significantly differed from each other on all outcomes (P<0.05), except for Polar V800’s alerts vs. ActiTrainer’s 1 hour sedentary bouts (P=0.595) and Polar V800’s walking time vs. ActiTrainer’s lifestyle time (P=0.484). Heteroscedasticity analyses were significant for all outcomes, except for Kcal and sitting time. The ROC-AUC value was fair (0.781±0.048) and the sensitivity and specificity was 98% and 58%, respectively.

Conclusions: The Polar V800 accelerometer has a comparable validity to the accelerometer in free-living conditions, regarding '1 hour sedentary bouts' and 'V800’s walking time vs. ActiTrainer’s lifestyle time' in young adults.


Statistics for USQ ePrint 37056
Statistics for this ePrint Item
Item Type: Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)
Refereed: Yes
Item Status: Live Archive
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: No Faculty
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: No Faculty
Date Deposited: 17 Oct 2019 05:24
Last Modified: 13 Jul 2021 04:28
Uncontrolled Keywords: accelerometry; energy expenditure (EE); physical activity (PA); validity; young adults
Fields of Research (2008): 11 Medical and Health Sciences > 1117 Public Health and Health Services > 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified
11 Medical and Health Sciences > 1106 Human Movement and Sports Science > 110699 Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classified
Fields of Research (2020): 42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4299 Other health sciences > 429999 Other health sciences not elsewhere classified
42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4207 Sports science and exercise > 420799 Sports science and exercise not elsewhere classified
Identification Number or DOI: doi:10.21037/atm.2016.07.16
URI: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/37056

Actions (login required)

View Item Archive Repository Staff Only