Yap, S. D. and Astals, S. and Jensen, P. D. and Batstone, D. J. and Tait, S. 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0816-8911
(2016)
Pilot-scale testing of a leachbed for anaerobic digestion of livestock residues on-farm.
Waste Management, 50.
pp. 300-308.
ISSN 0956-053X
Abstract
A leachbed is a relatively simple anaerobic digester suitable for high-solids residues and on-farm applications. However, performance characteristics and optimal configuration of leachbeds are not well-understood. In this study, two 200 L pilot-scale leachbeds fed with spent straw bedding from pigs/swine (methane potential, B-0 = 195-218 L CH4 kg(-1) VSfed) were used to assess the effects of leachate recirculation mode (trickling vs. flood-and-drain) on the digestion performance. Results showed comparable substrate solubilisation extents (30-45% of total chemical oxygen demand fed) and methane conversion (50% of the B-0) for the trickling and flood-and-drain modes, indicating that digestion performance was insensitive to the mode of leachate flow. However, the flood-and-drain leachbed mobilised more particulates into the leachate than the trickling leachbed, an undesirable outcome, because these particulates were mostly non-biodegradable. Inoculation with solid residues from a previous leachbed (inoculum-tosubstrate ratio of 0.22 on a VS basis) hastened the leachbed start-up, but methane recovery remained at 50% of the B-0 regardless of the leachate recirculation mode. Post-digestion testing indicated that the leachbeds may have been limited by microbial activity/inhibition. The high residual methane potential of leachate from the trickling (residual B-0 = 732 +/- 7 L CH4 kg(-1) VSfed) and flood-and-drain leachbeds (582 (+/-) 8 L CH4 kg(-1) VSfed) indicated an opportunity for further processing of leachate via a separate methanogenic step. Overall, a trickling leachbed appeared to be more favourable than the flood-and drain leachbed for treating spent bedding at farm-scale due to easier operation.
|
Statistics for this ePrint Item |
| Item Type: | Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C) |
|---|---|
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Item Status: | Live Archive |
| Additional Information: | Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions |
| Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: | Historic - Faculty of Health, Engineering and Sciences - School of Civil Engineering and Surveying (1 Jul 2013 - 31 Dec 2021) |
| Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: | Historic - Faculty of Health, Engineering and Sciences - School of Civil Engineering and Surveying (1 Jul 2013 - 31 Dec 2021) |
| Date Deposited: | 25 Mar 2019 05:24 |
| Last Modified: | 30 May 2019 03:20 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | anaerobic digestion, leachbed, solid-phase, manure straw, inoculation |
| Fields of Research (2008): | 09 Engineering > 0907 Environmental Engineering > 090703 Environmental Technologies |
| Fields of Research (2020): | 40 ENGINEERING > 4011 Environmental engineering > 401102 Environmentally sustainable engineering |
| Identification Number or DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.031 |
| URI: | http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/36092 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Archive Repository Staff Only |