A systematic review of geographical differences in management and outcomes for colorectal cancer in Australia

Ireland, Michael J. and March, Sonja and Crawford-Williams, Fiona and Cassimatis, Mandy and Aitken, Joanne F. and Hyde, Melissa K. and Chambers, Suzanne K. and Sun, Jiandong and Dunn, Jeff (2017) A systematic review of geographical differences in management and outcomes for colorectal cancer in Australia. BMC Cancer, 17 (1).

[img]
Preview
Text (Published Version)
2017. A systematic review of geographical differences in management and outcomes for colorectal cancer in Australia.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (673Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Background
Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the world, presenting considerable health, economic, and societal burden. Over a third of the Australian population live in regional areas and research has shown they experience a range of health disadvantages that result in a higher disease burden and lower life expectancy. The extent to which geographical disparities exist in CRC management and outcomes has not been systematically explored. The present review aims to identify the nature of geographical disparities in CRC survival, clinical management, and psychosocial outcomes.

Methods
The review followed PRISMA guidelines and searches were undertaken using seven databases covering articles between 1 January 1990 and 20 April 2016 in an Australian setting. Inclusion criteria stipulated studies had to be peer-reviewed, in English, reporting data from Australia on CRC patients and relevant to one of fourteen questions examining geographical variations in a) survival outcomes, b) patient and cancer characteristics, c) diagnostic and treatment characteristics and d) psychosocial and quality of life outcomes.

Results
Thirty-eight quantitative, two qualitative, and three mixed-methods studies met review criteria. Twenty-seven studies were of high quality, sixteen studies were of moderate quality, and no studies were found to be low quality. Individuals with CRC living in regional, rural, and remote areas of Australia showed poorer survival and experienced less optimal clinical management. However, this effect is likely moderated by a range of other factors (e.g., SES, age, gender) and did appear to vary linearly with increasing distance from metropolitan centres. No studies examined differences in use of stoma, or support with stomas, by geographic location.

Conclusions
Overall, despite evidence of disparity in CRC survival and clinical management across geographic locations, the evidence was limited and at times inconsistent. Further, access to treatment and services may not be the main driver of disparities, with individual patient characteristics and type of region also playing an important role.

A better understanding of factors driving ongoing and significant geographical disparities in cancer related outcomes is required to inform the development of effective interventions to improve the health and welfare of regional Australians.


Statistics for USQ ePrint 33457
Statistics for this ePrint Item
Item Type: Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)
Refereed: Yes
Item Status: Live Archive
Additional Information: Access to the published version in accordance with the Open Access copyright policy of the publisher.
Faculty / Department / School: Current - Institute for Resilient Regions
Date Deposited: 30 Jan 2018 01:54
Last Modified: 07 Feb 2018 01:48
Uncontrolled Keywords: bowel cancer, colorectal cancer, disparity, regional, health outcome
Fields of Research : 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences > 1701 Psychology > 170106 Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology
Identification Number or DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3067-1
URI: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/33457

Actions (login required)

View Item Archive Repository Staff Only