Analysing foregone costs of communities and carbon benefits in small scale community based forestry practice in Nepal

Pandey, Shiva Shankar and Maraseni, Tek Narayan and Reardon-Smith, Kathryn and Cockfield, Geoff (2017) Analysing foregone costs of communities and carbon benefits in small scale community based forestry practice in Nepal. Land Use Policy, 69. pp. 160-166. ISSN 0264-8377

Abstract

Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, conservation and sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon (REDD+) are considered to be important cost effective approaches for global climate change mitigation; therefore, such practices are evolving as the REDD+ payment mechanism in developing countries. Using six years (2006-2012) data, this paper analyses trade-offs between carbon stock gains and the costs incurred by communities in generating additional carbon in 105 REDD+ pilot community forests in Nepal. It estimates foregone benefits for communities engaged in increasing carbon stocks in various dominant vegetation types. At recent carbon and commodity prices, communities receive on average US$ 0.47/ha/year of carbon benefits with the additional investment of US$ 67.30/ha/year. One dollar’s worth of community cost resulted 0.23Mg of carbon sequestration. Therefore, carbon payment alone may not be an attractive incentive within small-scale community forestry and should linked with payments for ecosystem services. Moreover, the study found highest community sacrificed benefits in Shorea mixed broadleaf forests and lowest in Schima-Castanopsis forests, while carbon benefits were highest in Pine forests followed by Schima-Castanopsis forests and lowest in Rhododendron-Quercus forests. This indicates that costs and benefits may vary by vegetation type. A policy should consider payment for other environmental services, carbon gains, co-benefits and trade off while designing the REDD+ mechanism in community based forest land use practice with equitable community outcomes. The learnings from this study will help in the formulation of an appropriate REDD+ policy for community forestry.


Statistics for USQ ePrint 33412
Statistics for this ePrint Item
Item Type: Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)
Refereed: Yes
Item Status: Live Archive
Additional Information: Permanent restricted access to published version, in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
Faculty / Department / School: Current - Institute for Agriculture and the Environment
Date Deposited: 24 Jan 2018 05:05
Last Modified: 24 Jan 2018 05:05
Uncontrolled Keywords: climate change, community benefits, community based forest, forest land use, tree
Fields of Research : 05 Environmental Sciences > 0502 Environmental Science and Management > 050205 Environmental Management
Socio-Economic Objective: D Environment > 96 Environment > 9603 Climate and Climate Change > 960302 Climate Change Mitigation Strategies
Identification Number or DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.007
URI: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/33412

Actions (login required)

View Item Archive Repository Staff Only