Workplace Sitting Breaks Questionnaire (SITBRQ): an assessment of concurrent validity and test-retest reliability

Pedisic, Zeljko and Bennie, Jason A. and Timperio, Anna F. and Crawford, David A. and Dunstan, David W. and Bauman, Adrian E. and Salmon, Jo (2014) Workplace Sitting Breaks Questionnaire (SITBRQ): an assessment of concurrent validity and test-retest reliability. BMC Public Health, 14 (1). pp. 1-9.

Text (Published Version)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (342kB) | Preview


Background: Breaks in prolonged sitting may have beneficial cardiometabolic and musculoskeletal health outcomes. Desk-based work settings are an important environment to promote and support breaks in sitting time. However, few studies have reported the psychometric properties of self-report measures to assess the frequency and duration of breaks from sitting. This study examined the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Workplace Sitting Breaks Questionnaire (SITBRQ) designed to assess frequency and duration of breaks in sitting within desk-based work settings. Methods: To assess the concurrent validity, a sample of 147 desk-based employees completed the SITBRQ and wore an Actigraph GT1M accelerometer for seven consecutive days. To establish test-retest reliability, SITBRQ was administered on two separate occasions 7-14 days apart to a separate sample of 96 desk-based employees. Results: A low relative agreement with accelerometry (Spearman's r = 0.24 [95% CI 0.07-0.40]) was determined for self-reported frequency, but not for the duration of sitting breaks (Spearman's r = 0.05 [95% CI -0.12-0.22]). Adequate reliability was determined for both self-reported frequency (Spearman's r = 0.71 [95% CI 0.59-0.79], Cohen's kappa = 0.74 [95% CI 0.64-0.84]) and duration of sitting breaks (Spearman's r = 0.59 [95% CI 0.45-0.71], Cohen's kappa = 0.61 [95% CI 0.38-0.85]). Conclusion: SITBRQ may be used for assessment of the frequency of sitting breaks within desk-based work settings with validity and reliability similar to other self-reports in the field of sedentary behaviour research. However, until adequately improved and re-evaluated, it should not be used to collect data about the duration of breaks in sitting time.

Statistics for USQ ePrint 33365
Statistics for this ePrint Item
Item Type: Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)
Refereed: Yes
Item Status: Live Archive
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: No Faculty
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: No Faculty
Date Deposited: 22 Nov 2017 05:07
Last Modified: 22 Nov 2017 05:07
Uncontrolled Keywords: Accelerometer; Breaks in sitting time; Desk-based employees; Light-intensity physical activity; Physical activity; Reliability; Sedentary behaviour; Self-report; Validity; Adolescent; Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Movement; Posture; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Reduction Behavior; Sedentary Lifestyle; Self Report; Time Factors; Workplace; Young Adult;
Fields of Research (2008): 11 Medical and Health Sciences > 1106 Human Movement and Sports Science > 110602 Exercise Physiology
Socio-Economic Objectives (2008): C Society > 92 Health > 9205 Specific Population Health (excl. Indigenous Health) > 920505 Occupational Health
Identification Number or DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1249

Actions (login required)

View Item Archive Repository Staff Only