Governance values in the climate change regime: stakeholder perceptions of REDD+ legitimacy at the national level

Cadman, Timothy and Maraseni, Tek and Breakey, Hugh and Lopez-Casero, Federoico and Ma, Hwan Ok (2016) Governance values in the climate change regime: stakeholder perceptions of REDD+ legitimacy at the national level. Forests, 7 (10). pp. 212-228.

[img]
Preview
Text (Published Version)
Cadman_Maraseni_Breakey_Lopez-Casero_Hwan_PV.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0.

Download (1033Kb) | Preview

Abstract

This paper presents the results of two national-level studies of REDD+ governance values in Nepal and Papua New Guinea (PNG), using a hierarchical framework of principles, criteria, and indicators (PC&I), with evaluation at the indicator level. The research was conducted by means of an online survey to determine general perspectives on the governance quality of REDD+, as well as stakeholder workshops, in which participants were asked to rank indicators on the basis of perceived national significance. In the online survey, respondents in both countries identified inclusiveness and resources as the highest and lowest scoring governance values, while inclusiveness, resources, accountability, and transparency, were given priority, although their relative importance differed
between countries given national circumstances. The reasons for the commonalities and differences of perceptions between these countries are discussed. The findings suggest that while a generic set of governance values may be usefully applied for determining the institutional legitimacy of REDD+, their relative importance is different. This leads to the conclusion that it may not be appropriate to use a simplified approach to REDD+ governance, focusing for example on safeguards, given different national priorities and contexts.


Statistics for USQ ePrint 29782
Statistics for this ePrint Item
Item Type: Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)
Refereed: Yes
Item Status: Live Archive
Additional Information: © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Faculty / Department / School: No Faculty
Date Deposited: 05 Oct 2016 01:56
Last Modified: 24 Jan 2018 02:04
Uncontrolled Keywords: governance values; legitimacy; principles, criteria, and indicators (PC&I); inclusiveness; resources; accountability; transparency; REDD+
Fields of Research : 05 Environmental Sciences > 0502 Environmental Science and Management > 050205 Environmental Management
Socio-Economic Objective: D Environment > 96 Environment > 9609 Land and Water Management > 960906 Forest and Woodlands Land Management
Identification Number or DOI: 10.3390/f7100212
URI: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/29782

Actions (login required)

View Item Archive Repository Staff Only