Carbon dioxide vs air insufflation for elective colonoscopy: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Memon, Muhammed A. and Memon, Breda and Yunus, Rossita M. and Khan, Shahjahan (2016) Carbon dioxide vs air insufflation for elective colonoscopy: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, 26 (2). pp. 102-116. ISSN 1530-4515

[img]
Preview
Text (Submitted Version)
Memon_Memon_Yunus_Khan_SV.pdf

Download (268Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Aims and objective: The aim was to conduct a meta-analysis and systematic review of RCTs comparing two methods of colonic insufflation for elective colonoscopy i.e. carbon dioxide or air and to evaluate their efficiency, safety and side effects.

Material and Methods: Prospective RCTs comparing carbon dioxide versus air insufflation for colonic distension during colonoscopy were selected by searching PubMed, Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials published between January 1980 and October 2014.The outcome variables analyzed included procedural and immediate post-procedural pain (during, end or within 15 min after procedure), early post-procedural pain (between 30-120 min), intermediate post-procedural pain (360 min) and late post-procedural pain (720-1140 min), cecal/ileal intubation rate, cecal/ileal intubation time, and total colonoscopy examination time. These outcomes were unanimously decided to be important since they influence the practical approach towards patient management within and outside of hospital. Random effects model was used to calculate the effect size of both binary and continuous data. Heterogeneity amongst the outcome variables of these trials was determined by the Cochran Q statistic and I2 index. The meta-analysis was prepared in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

Results: Twenty four RCTs totaling 3996 patients (CO2=2017, Air=1979) were analyzed. Statistically significant differences for the pooled effect size were observed for procedural and immediate post-procedural pain (WMD 0.49, 95% CI 0.32, 0.73, p= 0.0005), early post-procedural pain between 30 and 120 minutes (WMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.12, 0.49, p=<0.0001), intermediate post-procedural pain i.e. 360 minutes post completion (WMD 0.35, 95% CI 0.23, 0.52, p=<0.0001) and late post-procedural pain, between 720 and 1440 minutes (WMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.34, 0.84, p=0.0061). Comparable effects were noted for cecal/ileal intubation rate (WMD 0.86, 95% CI 0.61, 1.22, p=0.3975), cecal/ileal intubation time (WMD -0.64, 95% CI -1.38, 0.09, p=0.0860) and total examination time (WMD -0.20, 95% CI -0.96, 0.57, p=0.6133).

Conclusions: On the basis of our meta-analysis and systematic review, we conclude that carbon dioxide insufflation significantly reduces abdominal pain during and following the procedure lasting up to 24 hours. There is no difference in the cecal/ileal intubation rate and time and total examination time between the two methods. Carbon dioxide retention with CO2 insufflation during and after the colonoscopy shows inconsequential variation compared to air insufflation and has no adverse effect on patients. Carbon dioxide instead of air should be routinely utilized for colonoscopy.


Statistics for USQ ePrint 28435
Statistics for this ePrint Item
Item Type: Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)
Refereed: Yes
Item Status: Live Archive
Additional Information: Submitted version deposited in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
Faculty / Department / School: Current - Faculty of Health, Engineering and Sciences - School of Agricultural, Computational and Environmental Sciences
Date Deposited: 24 Feb 2016 01:50
Last Modified: 04 Oct 2017 04:36
Uncontrolled Keywords: Colonoscopy; Carbon dioxide; Air; Randomized controlled trials; Human
Fields of Research : 11 Medical and Health Sciences > 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences > 119999 Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified
01 Mathematical Sciences > 0104 Statistics > 010499 Statistics not elsewhere classified
01 Mathematical Sciences > 0104 Statistics > 010402 Biostatistics
Socio-Economic Objective: E Expanding Knowledge > 97 Expanding Knowledge > 970111 Expanding Knowledge in the Medical and Health Sciences
E Expanding Knowledge > 97 Expanding Knowledge > 970101 Expanding Knowledge in the Mathematical Sciences
Identification Number or DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000243
URI: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/28435

Actions (login required)

View Item Archive Repository Staff Only