What would you do if....? Improving pilot performance during unexpected events through inflight scenario discussions

Martin, Wayne L. and Murray, Patrick S. and Bates, Paul R. (2011) What would you do if....? Improving pilot performance during unexpected events through inflight scenario discussions. Aeronautica, 1 (1). pp. 8-22. ISSN 1838-1480

Text (Accepted Version)
What would you do if._. Improving pilot performance during unexpected events through scenario discussions.pdf

Download (390Kb) | Preview
Text (Published Version)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (514Kb) | Preview


The ubiquitous reliability of the modern airliner has engendered a significant change in the traditional causes of aircraft accidents. Engine reliability in particular, coupled with sophisticated systems for flight path awareness such as Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning Systems (EGPWS), Vertical Situation Displays (VSD's), Head Up Displays (HUD's) and Electronic Flight Bags (EFB's), have greatly decreased the prevalence of controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) accidents. Inflight loss of control (ILOC) has become far more common than CFIT, often as a result of automation anomalies, failures or mismanagement.

With engine failures and fires becoming relatively rare, it is the novel and unexpected events, coupled with human related mismanagement of those events, often through a lack of knowledge and/or expectation, which are weighing on modern accident statistics. A project was completed over 10 weeks at an Australasian Airline, where pilots were encouraged to discuss novel event scenarios. It was hypothesised that discussion of novel events would, in the absence of actual practice, develop a mental plan for the management of such events and also raise levels of expectation for such events. At the completion of the project all the pilots were asked to complete an online survey which outlined their perceptions of project utility, expectation and efficacy as a result of the discussions. While only 44% of available pilots responded, results were overwhelmingly positive.

Statistics for USQ ePrint 27378
Statistics for this ePrint Item
Item Type: Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)
Refereed: Yes
Item Status: Live Archive
Additional Information: Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. Aeronautica provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: Historic - Faculty of Business and Law - School of Accounting, Economics and Finance
Date Deposited: 08 Sep 2016 03:59
Last Modified: 31 Jan 2017 03:31
Uncontrolled Keywords: critical events; pilot; aviation; scenario based training
Fields of Research : 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences > 1701 Psychology > 170199 Psychology not elsewhere classified
17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences > 1702 Cognitive Sciences > 170299 Cognitive Science not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective: E Expanding Knowledge > 97 Expanding Knowledge > 970117 Expanding Knowledge in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
URI: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/27378

Actions (login required)

View Item Archive Repository Staff Only