Murray, Katie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5165-1941
(2014)
Australia: acting on opponents' mistakes - Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd and the inadvertent disclosure of privileged material.
Legal Ethics, 17 (1).
pp. 132-134.
ISSN 1460-728X
|
Text (Published Version)
Murray_LE_2014_PV.pdf Download (77kB) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5235/1460728X.17.1.132
Abstract
This is a note about the 2013 High Court decision in Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd, which dealt with the inadvertent disclosure of privileged material.
![]() |
Statistics for this ePrint Item |
Item Type: | Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C) |
---|---|
Refereed: | No |
Item Status: | Live Archive |
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: | Current - Faculty of Business, Education, Law and Arts - School of Law and Justice (1 Jul 2013 -) |
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: | Current - Faculty of Business, Education, Law and Arts - School of Law and Justice (1 Jul 2013 -) |
Date Deposited: | 07 Dec 2014 05:48 |
Last Modified: | 22 Aug 2019 04:52 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | inadvertent disclosure, waiver of privilege, Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules |
Fields of Research (2008): | 18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180121 Legal Practice, Lawyering and the Legal Profession |
Fields of Research (2020): | 48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES > 4805 Legal systems > 480505 Legal practice, lawyering and the legal profession |
Socio-Economic Objectives (2008): | C Society > 94 Law, Politics and Community Services > 9404 Justice and the Law > 940406 Legal Processes |
Identification Number or DOI: | https://doi.org/10.5235/1460728X.17.1.132 |
URI: | http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/26036 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Archive Repository Staff Only |