Coyle, Ian R. and Thomson, Donald M. (2014) Opening up a can of worms: how do decision-makers decide when witnesses are telling the truth? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21 (4). pp. 475-491. ISSN 1321-8719
Abstract
Correctly determining witness credibility is integral to a fair trial. Assessments of credibility made by the triers of fact are made, amongst other things, by reference to behavioural stereotypes that are commonly thought to be associated with lying and truth-telling. These stereotypes
are worthless but pervasive. In this study, potential jurors were given information such as would be given by way of judicial direction and/or expert testimony on those behavioural indicia that are useful in detecting deception. Major changes in perceptions of what does and does not work were found. This has significant implications for the conduct of criminal trials. Recommendations are presented which, it is argued, can be of real, practical, assistance in enabling decision-makers to assess the credibility of witnesses.
|
Statistics for this ePrint Item |
| Item Type: | Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C) |
|---|---|
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Item Status: | Live Archive |
| Additional Information: | Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions. |
| Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: | Historic - Faculty of Health, Engineering and Sciences - School of Psychology, Counselling and Community (1 Jul 2013 - 31 Dec 2014) |
| Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: | Historic - Faculty of Health, Engineering and Sciences - School of Psychology, Counselling and Community (1 Jul 2013 - 31 Dec 2014) |
| Date Deposited: | 25 Oct 2013 05:05 |
| Last Modified: | 19 Jul 2017 05:12 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | credibility; demeanour; detection; jurors; truthfulness; witnesses |
| Fields of Research (2008): | 22 Philosophy and Religious Studies > 2201 Applied Ethics > 220105 Legal Ethics 18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180120 Legal Institutions (incl. Courts and Justice Systems) 16 Studies in Human Society > 1602 Criminology > 160203 Courts and Sentencing |
| Fields of Research (2020): | 50 PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES > 5001 Applied ethics > 500105 Legal ethics 48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES > 4805 Legal systems > 480504 Legal institutions (incl. courts and justice systems) 44 HUMAN SOCIETY > 4402 Criminology > 440203 Courts and sentencing |
| Socio-Economic Objectives (2008): | C Society > 94 Law, Politics and Community Services > 9404 Justice and the Law > 940406 Legal Processes |
| Identification Number or DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2013.837803 |
| URI: | http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/24203 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Archive Repository Staff Only |