Reviewing the monitoring and evaluation practices and perceptions of Australia’s regional natural resource management organisations

Richardson, Lucy (2012) Reviewing the monitoring and evaluation practices and perceptions of Australia’s regional natural resource management organisations. [Thesis (PhD/Research)]

[img] Text (Whole Thesis)
Richardson_2012_whole.pdf

Download (9Mb)
[img] Text (Introductory Pages)
Richardson_2012_front.pdf

Download (39Kb)

Abstract

Established under a joint venture between the Australian Government and the individual state and territory governments, Australia’s regional natural resource management (NRM) organisations have been the primary structures for delivering NRM investment programs across Australia. The quantity of investment devolved through these organisations places significant accountability pressure on them and requires them to evaluate the impacts of their programs. Despite the increasing volume of literature about these NRM bodies, no previous review has established a baseline of the regional bodies’ evaluation practices and capabilities on a national scale.
This research reviews the monitoring and evaluation drivers, barriers and practices of these regional bodies. Findings include the identification of two main driver factors (improvement and maintenance), two barrier factors (skills and resourcing, and technical) and three practice factors (monitoring and evaluating intermediate outcomes, appropriateness of investment aspects, and need and benefit). The majority of regional bodies were operating within the higher level expanded contextual (25 percent) and constitutive and bounded rationality (58 percent) evaluation model groups. The results suggest that very few regional bodies are operating within the more narrowly focused organisational excellence (11 percent) and political and symbolic (6 percent) evaluation model groups. Evaluation capabilities and culture were also high across the regional bodies in line with the high level evaluation models generally being applied.
A review of the influence of the statutory status of the regional bodies, which applies in some states, identified statistical differences between the evaluation barriers and models of statutory and non-statutory regional bodies but not between their drivers, practices, capability, culture, satisfaction levels or partnerships.
Important relationships of relevance for the future evolution of this sector were also identified through the analysis and include links between the presence of corporate strategic planning and organisation size and the higher level evaluation models.


Statistics for USQ ePrint 23361
Statistics for this ePrint Item
Item Type: Thesis (PhD/Research)
Item Status: Live Archive
Additional Information: Masters of Business thesis.
Faculty / Department / School: Historic - Faculty of Business and Law - No Department
Supervisors: Cockfield, Geoff
Date Deposited: 22 Apr 2013 06:26
Last Modified: 18 Jul 2016 01:20
Uncontrolled Keywords: natural resource management; evaluation drivers; Australia; investment aspects; outcomes; regional bodies; Australian government; evaluation models
Fields of Research : 05 Environmental Sciences > 0502 Environmental Science and Management > 050209 Natural Resource Management
05 Environmental Sciences > 0502 Environmental Science and Management > 050205 Environmental Management
05 Environmental Sciences > 0501 Ecological Applications > 050104 Landscape Ecology
Socio-Economic Objective: D Environment > 96 Environment > 9606 Environmental and Natural Resource Evaluation > 960605 Institutional Arrangements for Environmental Protection
URI: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/23361

Actions (login required)

View Item Archive Repository Staff Only