Land tenure management in a dynamic social, economic and environmental context

McDougall, Kevin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6088-1004 and Paterson, Mark (2003) Land tenure management in a dynamic social, economic and environmental context. In: 2003 Spatial Sciences Institute Biennial Conference: Spatial Knowledge Without Boundaries (SSC2003), 22-26 Sep 2003, Canberra, Australia.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published Version)
SSC_2003_Property_Rights_final.pdf

Download (160kB)

Abstract

The Bathurst Declaration on Land Administration for Sustainable Development (FIG 1999) identified that the
relationship of people with the land was causing increasingly serious problems. In Australia, the issues of native title, land degradation, vegetation clearing and water management are creating a more complex land
management environment that, more often than not, results in competition between private and community interests. Land administration systems in Australia were not designed to address this additional complexity and are now experiencing increasing difficulty in managing the dynamic nature of property rights and responsibilities that are emerging.
This paper examines the current land administration system in Queensland with the view to proposing a more dynamic system of tenure management. Specifically, it identifies some recent legislative changes which have significantly affected rights and responsibilities of rural property owners. The implications of these changes on landholders and related stakeholders such as rural investors, valuers, banks and government departments will be discussed. An adapted model of the Cadastre 2014 vision is proffered as an alternative model for reform of the existing land administration system through the use of legal land objects as a mechanism to deal with increasingly dynamic nature of property rights. It is proposed that by utilising a system of legal land objects a clearer picture of the true value, rights and responsibilities associated with property may be established. The paper also suggests areas of research that will need to be pursued in order to meet the future challenges in resolving conflicts between the community interests in property and the rights of individual owners.


Statistics for USQ ePrint 1736
Statistics for this ePrint Item
Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Commonwealth Reporting Category E) (Paper)
Refereed: Yes
Item Status: Live Archive
Additional Information: No evidence of copyright restrictions on web site.
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: Historic - Faculty of Engineering and Surveying - Department of Surveying and Land Information (Up to 30 Jun 2013)
Faculty/School / Institute/Centre: Historic - Faculty of Engineering and Surveying - Department of Surveying and Land Information (Up to 30 Jun 2013)
Date Deposited: 11 Oct 2007 00:50
Last Modified: 02 Jul 2013 22:39
Uncontrolled Keywords: land administration; cadastre; rights and responsibilities; dynamic
Fields of Research (2008): 18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180124 Property Law (excl. Intellectual Property Law)
16 Studies in Human Society > 1605 Policy and Administration > 160509 Public Administration
09 Engineering > 0909 Geomatic Engineering > 090903 Geospatial Information Systems
Fields of Research (2020): 48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES > 4806 Private law and civil obligations > 480604 Property law (excl. intellectual property law)
44 HUMAN SOCIETY > 4407 Policy and administration > 440708 Public administration
40 ENGINEERING > 4013 Geomatic engineering > 401302 Geospatial information systems and geospatial data modelling
Socio-Economic Objectives (2008): D Environment > 96 Environment > 9607 Environmental Policy, Legislation and Standards > 960704 Land Stewardship
URI: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/1736

Actions (login required)

View Item Archive Repository Staff Only