Baird, Rachel (2007) Arresting climate change through incremental steps: Massachusetts v Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 24 (4). pp. 245-249. ISSN 0813-300X
|HTML Citation||EndNote||Dublin Core||Reference Manager|
Full text not available from this archive.
US Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v Environmental Protection Agency confirms the risk of harm from climate change and global warming - its relevance for Australia - demonstrates that local jurisdictions are looking at restricting local activity for the wellbeing of future generations globally.
|Item Type:||Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)|
|Additional Information:||Awaiting Author's version, which may be deposited in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Published Version available from Legal Online database http://legalonline.thomson.com.au/.|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||climate change|
|Fields of Research (FOR2008):||18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180111 Environmental and Natural Resources Law|
|Socio-Economic Objective (SEO2008):||C Society > 94 Law, Politics and Community Services > 9404 Justice and the Law > 940499 Justice and the Law not elsewhere classified|
D Environment > 96 Environment > 9603 Climate and Climate Change > 960311 Social Impacts of Climate Change and Variability
|Deposited On:||15 Apr 2010 07:49|
|Last Modified:||19 Mar 2012 14:25|
Archive Staff Only: edit this record