Stacking the Commission: has it occurred and does it matter in unfair dismissal arbitration?

Southey, Kim and Fry, Simon (2010) Stacking the Commission: has it occurred and does it matter in unfair dismissal arbitration? In: AIRAANZ 2010: Work in Progress: Crises, Choices and Continuity, 3-5 Feb 2010, Sydney, Australia.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Accepted Version)
Southey_Fry_AIRAANZ_2010_AV.pdf

Download (344Kb)
[img]
Preview
PDF (Published Version)
Southey_Fry_AIRAANZ_2010_PV.pdf

Download (344Kb)

Abstract

The Keating and Howard governments were accused of stacking the personnel of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) with appointees from respectively, union and employer associated backgrounds. By January 2010, the Labor Government will have its version of an industrial umpire, Fair Work Australia (FWA), fully operational. Labor’s claim is that the FWA appointment process will prevent the making of biased selections of members by the party in power. The unresolved question is whether such stacking, if it has occurred, matters? By conducting an examination of 883 unfair dismissal claims subjected to arbitration by the AIRC from 2001 to 2005, we conclude that the representation of employer and union members hearing unfair dismissal claims during the data collection period, is reasonably balanced in spite of the various figures produced by different bodies. A mildly significant correlation exists between the work background of the members and their substantive arbitration decisions, that is, members may be more likely to make a decision that is congruent with them having worked in either employer or worker focused positions, prior to AIRC appointment. Although when non-substantive arbitration decisions were analysed, the correlation between the members’ backgrounds and their decisions was insignificant. Here it appears that jurisdictional guidelines may logically limit the potential to exercise bias in arbitral decision making.


Statistics for USQ ePrint 6817
Statistics for this ePrint Item
Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Commonwealth Reporting Category E) (Paper)
Refereed: Yes
Item Status: Live Archive
Additional Information: No evidence of copyright restrictions.
Depositing User: Mrs Kim Southey
Faculty / Department / School: Historic - Faculty of Business - School of Management and Marketing
Date Deposited: 07 Jul 2010 04:42
Last Modified: 02 Jul 2013 23:38
Uncontrolled Keywords: unfair dismissal; arbitration; bias; AIRC; Australian Industrial Relations Commission; stacking; employer; Liberal; union; Labor; FWA; Fair Work Australia
Fields of Research (FOR2008): 15 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services > 1503 Business and Management > 150306 Industrial Relations
18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180120 Legal Institutions (incl. Courts and Justice Systems)
18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180118 Labour Law
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO2008): C Society > 94 Law, Politics and Community Services > 9405 Work and Institutional Development > 940599 Work and Institutional Development not elsewhere classified
URI: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/6817

Actions (login required)

View Item Archive Repository Staff Only