Collins, Pauline (2009) What is good for the goose should be good for the gander: the operation of the Rome Statute in the Australian context. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 32 (1). pp. 106-142. ISSN 0313-0096
This is the latest version of this item.
PDF (Accepted Version)
This paper considers the Australian declaration made at the time of ratifying the Rome Statute and its implications for the International Criminal Court (ICC) within the Australian context. The nature of the declaration is investigated in light of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, and in particular the International Law Commission’s recent Draft Guidelines on Reservations. It concludes that Australia would have a more respected voice at the international level were it to withdraw the declaration and aim for the greatest possible cooperation with the ICC in the pursuit of justice in regard to serious violations such as genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.
|Item Type:||Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)|
|Additional Information:||Author's version deposited with blanket permission of publisher.|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||ICC; Rome Statute; Australian Declaration|
|Subjects:||390000 Law, Justice and Law Enforcement|
|Depositing User:||Ms Pauline Collins|
|Date Deposited:||22 Dec 2009 09:19|
|Last Modified:||02 Jul 2013 23:30|
Available Versions of this Item
What is good for the goose should be good for the gander: the operation of the Rome Statute in the Australian context. (deposited 06 Jul 2009 23:15)
- What is good for the goose should be good for the gander: the operation of the Rome Statute in the Australian context. (deposited 22 Dec 2009 09:19) [Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)
|Archive Repository Staff Only|