Byrne, Mark (2009) Restitution and equity: a comparison of principle. VDM Verlag Dr Muller, Saarbrucken, Germany. ISBN 978-3-639-18629-1Full text not available from this repository.
Unjust enrichment has been recognised in Australia as a 'unifying concept' to explain when restitution may be appropriate. Since that time however there has been great uncertainty as to whether these principles have any relationship to the law of equity. There have been claims that restitution should be just as recognisable within equitable cases as it is in common law claims. As a jurisdiction where there has been great development in equity however fears have been expressed that unjust enrichment may actually have the potential to distort the interpretation of equitable principles. This book looks at areas of law where there is potential overlap between restitution and equity and compares the basis for the remedies awarded.
Statistics for this ePrint Item
|Item Type:||Book (Commonwealth Reporting Category A)|
|Item Status:||Live Archive|
|Additional Information (displayed to public):||Unavailable in electronic format. Print copy held in USQ Library at call no. 346.94029 Byr.|
|Depositing User:||Mr Mark Byrne|
|Faculty / Department / School:||Historic - Faculty of Business - School of Law|
|Date Deposited:||05 Oct 2009 06:42|
|Last Modified:||28 Aug 2014 05:01|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||restitution; equity|
|Fields of Research (FoR):||18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180199 Law not elsewhere classified|
|Socio-Economic Objective (SEO):||C Society > 94 Law, Politics and Community Services > 9499 Other Law, Politics and Community Services > 949999 Law, Politics and Community Services not elsewhere classified|
Actions (login required)
|Archive Repository Staff Only|