Mackenzie, Geraldine and Stobbs, Nigel and Thomas, Mark (2007) What really happened versus what we can prove: tension between the coroner and the DPP. Indigenous Law Bulletin, 6 (24). pp. 6-10. ISSN 1328-5475
Metadata
| HTML Citation | EndNote | Dublin Core | Reference Manager |
Full text available as:
| PDF (Accepted Manuscript) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader 56Kb |
Official URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ILB/2007/2.html
Abstract
According to Queensland law, any death which occurs in police custody must be subject to a coronial inquest. Such an investigation is required by best practice guidelines to have regard, where applicable, for the recommendations and findings of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody and to be conducted in such a way as to be more sensitive and compassionate towards families than has been the case in the past. This article considers the coronial inquest of Mulrunji, a 36-year-old Aboriginal man resident on Palm Island, who died in police custody in the Palm Island watch-house on 19 November 2004.
| Item Type: | Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Copyright is retained by author. Author grants publisher a non-exclusive licence. First publication rights granted to the journal. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | death in custody, coronial inquest, police prosecutor |
| Fields of Research (FOR2008): | 18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180121 Legal Practice, Lawyering and the Legal Profession |
| Subjects: | 390000 Law, Justice and Law Enforcement > 390200 Professional Development of Law Practitioners > 390201 Legal Practice |
| Socio-Economic Objective (SEO2008): | C Society > 94 Law, Politics and Community Services > 9404 Justice and the Law > 940406 Legal Processes |
| ID Code: | 5046 |
| Deposited By: | |
| Deposited On: | 22 May 2009 10:17 |
| Last Modified: | 31 Jan 2012 12:22 |
Archive Staff Only: edit this record
