Mortensen, Reid (2007) Ethics in negotiation and ADR - Legal Services Commissioner v Mullins. Proctor, 27 (1). pp. 10-11. ISSN 1321-8794
Metadata
| HTML Citation | EndNote | MODS | Dublin Core | Reference Manager |
Full text available as:
![[img]](/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
| PDF (Published Version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader 465Kb |
Official URL: http://www.qls.com.au/lwp/wcm/connect/QLS/Online+Library+&+Shop/Publications+&+News/Proctor
Abstract
A barrister who failed to reveal his client's newly diagnosed cancer during alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for a personal injuries claim has learnt the hard way that lawyers must be consistently truthful in not only litigation but also mediation and other forms of ADR.
| Item Type: | Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Version of Record deposited with blanket permission of publisher. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | alternative dispute resolution; ADR; ethics |
| Fields of Research (FOR2008): | 18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180121 Legal Practice, Lawyering and the Legal Profession |
| Subjects: | 390000 Law, Justice and Law Enforcement > 390200 Professional Development of Law Practitioners > 390204 Professional Ethics |
| Socio-Economic Objective (SEO2008): | UNSPECIFIED |
| ID Code: | 5024 |
| Deposited By: | |
| Deposited On: | 25 May 2009 12:36 |
| Last Modified: | 14 Dec 2011 11:55 |
Archive Staff Only: edit this record