Autochthonous essential: state courts and a national cooperative scheme of civil jurisdiction

Mortensen, Reid (2003) Autochthonous essential: state courts and a national cooperative scheme of civil jurisdiction. University of Tasmania Law Review, 22 (2). pp. 109-148. ISSN 0082-2108

Metadata

HTML CitationEndNoteDublin CoreReference Manager

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published Version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
2099Kb

Official URL: http://www.lawreview.law.utas.edu.au/

Abstract

Through the 1980s and 1990s, Australian governments and courts developed a uniform scheme for the exercise of civil jurisdiction across the country. The twentieth century saw increasing recognition that within federal and complex political associations, there is generally a positive relationship between the ability of courts to enforce their judgments throughout a federal or transnational market area and its economic and social integration.2 However, a willingness to let courts' judgments `circulate' freely over internal borders in a multistate area also suggests confidence that those courts exercise proportionate civil jurisdictions that are acceptable to all of its polities.

Item Type:Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)
Additional Information:Authors retain copyright.
Uncontrolled Keywords:state courts; national scheme; civil jurisdiction; Australia
Fields of Research (FOR2008):18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180104 Civil Law and Procedure
Subjects:390000 Law, Justice and Law Enforcement > 390100 Law > 390109 Civil Law
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO2008):UNSPECIFIED
ID Code:5019
Deposited By:
Deposited On:06 Apr 2009 15:04
Last Modified:30 Aug 2012 15:12

Archive Staff Only: edit this record