Gray, Anthony (2008) Getting it right: where is the place of the wrong in multinational torts cases? Sydney Law Review, 30 (3). pp. 537-550. ISSN 0082-0512
Metadata
| HTML Citation | EndNote | Dublin Core | Reference Manager |
Full text available as:
| MS Word (Letter of Permission) - Archive staff only 42Kb | ||
| PDF (Published Version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader 119Kb |
Official URL: http://www.law.usyd.edu.au/slr/slr30_3/Gray.pdf
Abstract
[Abstract]: The High Court has in recent years settled on the law of the place of the wrong as the choice of law rule in tort. This means that arguments will turn to the identification of that place, as a recent case shows, particularly where a situation has links with more than one jurisdiction. This is an issue about which reasonable minds will differ, but in the context of a claim in negligence for work-related injuries, the place of the wrong should be where the employee was exposed to the dangerous working environment.
| Item Type: | Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Version of Record deposited with permission of publisher. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | place of the wrong; choice of law in tort; lex loci delicti |
| Fields of Research (FOR2008): | 18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180116 International Law (excl. International Trade Law) |
| Subjects: | 390000 Law, Justice and Law Enforcement > 390100 Law > 390111 International Law |
| Socio-Economic Objective (SEO2008): | UNSPECIFIED |
| ID Code: | 4398 |
| Deposited By: | |
| Deposited On: | 07 Oct 2008 12:39 |
| Last Modified: | 24 Feb 2012 10:15 |
Archive Staff Only: edit this record
