Clear zones in urban environments

Gallagher, Tony (2007) Clear zones in urban environments. [USQ Project] (Unpublished)

Metadata

HTML CitationEndNoteDublin CoreReference Manager

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
10Mb

Abstract

[Abstract]: Run off road accidents are global problems, with fatal and serious injuries reported for speeds of 40 km/hour and above. Frequency and severity of these injuries can be significantly impacted by providing a safe roadside environment. This can be achieved by ensuring the area adjacent to the roadside is free of obstacles, hazards and distractions and is designed to maximise drivers' opportunity to regain control of an errant vehicle. A 'clear zone' is the total width from the traffic lane edge required to be clear of roadside hazards. A variety of hazards may occur within the specified clear zone including point and continuous hazards. There is still some conjecture about the diameter size of trees and poles to be classified as hazards. A hierarchy of treatments exists with six different methods recommended. Practicalities of treatments in urban areas must be considered. Questions arise about the classification of hazards and the inherent risks associated with their presence, including the treatment of new infrastructure versus current treatments of existing rigid objects and potential hazards in specified clear zones. To meet legal requirements, road authorities must fulfil their duty of care to road users. They must not create a foreseeable risk of harm and are obliged to take reasonable steps to remedy an existing risk within a reasonable time. The court recognises that resources are limited, including man power and funding. Road authorities need methods in place to prioritise projects to address safety issues. Quantitative and qualitative assessments are required to prioritise and assess the engineering, environmental and social ramifications of safety concerns and proposed treatments. Designers and engineers are reluctant to make subjective decisions that may not be supported by standards. Practical treatment solutions must be ‘fit for purpose’. The conclusion of this paper provides tools that designers and engineers can use to assist the evaluation process.

Item Type:USQ Project
Uncontrolled Keywords:urban environment; roadside hazard; clear zones; road safety
Fields of Research (FOR2008):09 Engineering > 0905 Civil Engineering > 090505 Infrastructure Engineering and Asset Management
09 Engineering > 0905 Civil Engineering > 090507 Transport Engineering
09 Engineering > 0907 Environmental Engineering > 090703 Environmental Technologies
Subjects:290000 Engineering and Technology > 291100 Environmental Engineering > 291104 Environmental Technologies
290000 Engineering and Technology > 290800 Civil Engineering > 290803 Transport Engineering
290000 Engineering and Technology > 290800 Civil Engineering > 290899 Civil Engineering not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO2008):UNSPECIFIED
ID Code:3944
Deposited By:
Deposited On:29 Feb 2008 14:23
Last Modified:23 Oct 2010 10:34

Archive Staff Only: edit this record