Beattie, Claire (2007) Reporting on service performance: measurement and myth in the New Zealand compulsory education sector. In: 7th Global Conference on Business & Economics, 13-14 Oct 2007, Rome, Italy.
Metadata
| HTML Citation | EndNote | MODS | Dublin Core | Reference Manager |
Full text available as:
| PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader 96Kb |
Official URL: http://www.facultyforum.com/gcbe/
Abstract
[Abstract]: This paper reports on the results of a case study investigating the response of New Zealand schools to the legislative requirement to prepare service performance reports. To date, the ongoing failure to successfully establish service performance reporting in schools suggests further research is warranted. Prime facie, it was expected that schools would find the output and outcome distinction underlying the Ministry of Education’s procedural guidelines difficult to apply. However, the case study findings support this expectation to a surprising extent. Schools do not apply the output/outcome distinction to their choice of objectives because they include only activities that are easy to measure in their statements of service performance. Objectives are then designed to fit these activities. In this sense, schools adopt a historical and arbitrary methodology to service performance reporting whilst government policy assumes a forward looking and purposeful approach. The research findings also suggest that schools do not prepare statements of service performance in the way intended by the reporting framework because they question its applicability and relevance. Participants expressed concerns with the language used in service performance reporting because it is informed by terminology which they perceive to be associated with commercial enterprises. Schools felt this model was incongruous with the educational environment. Overall, the research suggests that schools are not prepared to devote sufficient time and resources to developing adequate reports of service performance. If, as appears to be case, “service performance reports are [expected to be] forged in the field, by the public entities required to produce them” (Thompson, 1995, p.337) then service performance reporting in the school sector seems destined to remain a controversial and problematic issue for both the schools and the New Zealand government.
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Commonwealth Reporting Category E) (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | No evidence of copyright restrictions on web site. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | New Zealand, schools, service performance reports, service performance reporting |
| Fields of Research (FOR2008): | 13 Education > 1303 Specialist Studies in Education > 130304 Educational Administration, Management and Leadership 15 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services > 1501 Accounting, Auditing and Accountability > 150102 Auditing and Accountability 13 Education > 1303 Specialist Studies in Education > 130303 Education Assessment and Evaluation |
| Subjects: | 350000 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services > 350100 Accounting, Auditing and Accountability |
| Socio-Economic Objective (SEO2008): | UNSPECIFIED |
| ID Code: | 3691 |
| Deposited By: | |
| Deposited On: | 03 Jan 2008 15:31 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Nov 2011 11:46 |
Archive Staff Only: edit this record
