A comparison of methods for mapping golf greens

Reynolds, Wade and Young, Frank R. and Gibbings, Peter (2007) A comparison of methods for mapping golf greens. Spatial Science Queensland, 2007 (4). pp. 33-36. ISSN 1032-3848

[img]
Preview
PDF
Reynolds_Young_Gibbings_2007_Authorversion.pdf

Download (456Kb)

Abstract

Several golf greens were mapped using a RTK GPS, Riegl 3D-Laser Mirror Scanner and Trimble S6 Robotic Total Station systems to determine the most appropriate method for this task. The RTK GPS was the easiest methods for data capture but was insufficiently accurate for mapping at a contour interval of 0.05 m or less in this situation. The laser scanner level data accuracy was slightly more accurate than the robotic total station but both produces results that were suitable for golf green mapping. However, the ease of use of the robotic total station determined this as the preferred methodology for golf green mapping with a 0.05m contour interval.


Statistics for USQ ePrint 3010
Statistics for this ePrint Item
Item Type: Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)
Refereed: No
Item Status: Live Archive
Additional Information: Author retains copyright.
Depositing User: Mr Peter Gibbings
Faculty / Department / School: Historic - Faculty of Engineering and Surveying - Department of Surveying and Land Information
Date Deposited: 19 Mar 2008 12:28
Last Modified: 02 Jul 2013 22:48
Fields of Research (FOR2008): 09 Engineering > 0909 Geomatic Engineering > 090906 Surveying (incl. Hydrographic Surveying)
URI: http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/3010

Actions (login required)

View Item Archive Repository Staff Only