Maraseni, Tek N. and Cockfield, Geoff and Apan, Armando (2007) A comparison of greenhouse gas emissions from inputs into farm enterprises in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part A: Toxic Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering, 42 (1). pp. 11-18. ISSN 1093-4529
|HTML Citation||EndNote||Dublin Core||Reference Manager|
Full text available as:
|PDF (Author's version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10934520601015354
Identification Number or DOI: doi: 10.1080/10934520601015354
One of the assumptions underlying efforts to convert cropping land, especially marginal crop land, to plantations is that there will be a net reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, with a gas 'sink' replacing a high energy system in which the breakdown of biomass is routinely accelerated to prepare for new crops. This research, based on case studies in Kingaroy in south-east Queensland, compares the amount of greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions from a peanut/maize crop rotation, a pasture system for beef production and a spotted gum (Corymbia citriodora) timber plantation. Three production inputs, fuel, farm machinery and agrochemicals (fertilizer, pesticides and herbicides) are considered. The study extends beyond the farm gate to include packing and transportation and the time period is 30 years. The results suggest that replacing the crops with plantations would indeed reduce emissions but that a pasture system would have even lower net emissions. These findings cast some doubt on the case for farm forestry as a relatively effective means of ameliorating greenhouse gas emissions.
Archive Staff Only: edit this record