Gray, Anthony (2012) Constitutionally protecting the presumption of innocence. University of Tasmania Law Review, 31 (1). pp. 131-152. ISSN 0082-2108
Metadata
| HTML Citation | EndNote | Dublin Core | Reference Manager |
Full text available as:
| PDF (Published Version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader 237Kb |
Official URL: http://www.utas.edu.au/law/centres/university-of-tasmania-law-review
Abstract
This article investigates the current status in Australian law of the fundamental principle of presumption of innocence. It finds that there are increasing examples where such a principle is effectively undermined. The High Court has to date generally shown a laissez-faire attitude to legislation detracting from the presumption, and it is argued that the Court should, by embracing the notion of a fair trial, constitutionally entrench such a fundamental right. Support for this position is drawn from comparable nations around the world where courts and legislators have acted to preserve such a fundamental right.
| Item Type: | Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Authors retain copyright. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | presumption of innocence; reverse onus; due process; fair trial; constitution; criminal due process rights |
| Fields of Research (FOR2008): | 18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180108 Constitutional Law 22 Philosophy and Religious Studies > 2201 Applied Ethics > 220104 Human Rights and Justice Issues 18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180119 Law and Society |
| Subjects: | UNSPECIFIED |
| Socio-Economic Objective (SEO2008): | C Society > 94 Law, Politics and Community Services > 9404 Justice and the Law > 940403 Criminal Justice |
| ID Code: | 21656 |
| Deposited By: | |
| Deposited On: | 30 Aug 2012 15:12 |
| Last Modified: | 16 Jan 2013 09:52 |
Archive Staff Only: edit this record
