Abeysekera, Vasantha (2012) Resolving retention polarity: the perceptions of structural steel fabricators. In: World Construction Conference 2012: Global Challenges in Constrcution Industry, 28-30 June 2012, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
PDF (Accepted Version)
This study aims to understand the perceived polarity between main contractors and subcontractors with a view to resolving problems connected with retentions in an environment where a sliding-retention regime is utilised with a retention rate of 10% for work below NZ $ 200,000. Eight structural steel subcontractors operating in Auckland were interviewed. Contrary to popular belief, subcontractors are not averse to retentions with most taking a middle ground. Nevertheless, the apparently fair practice of using back-to-back contract terms is not seen as fair and reasonable. Most solutions acceptable to subcontractors impact negatively on contractors’ cash flow highlighting the need for some form of reciprocity from subcontractors (price discounts, improved performance, etc.) to induce contractors to offer favourable retention regimes. This highlights the need for a theory on ‘retention reciprocity’ to supplement the five theories on retentions. However, given that not all contractors can be expected to display reciprocity fairness, an interventionist approach may be necessary in order to neutralise any imbalances in power between the contracting parties possibly through amendments to the Construction Contracts Act, and when doing so, there is a need to exercise much caution as the outcome of chaotic systems could be quite unpredictable.
|Item Type:||Conference or Workshop Item (Commonwealth Reporting Category E) (Paper)|
|Additional Information:||Published version © Ceylon Institute of Builders - Sri Lanka.|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||reciprocity, retentions, construction contracts act|
|Depositing User:||Dr Vasantha Abeysekera|
|Date Deposited:||16 Jul 2012 05:21|
|Last Modified:||03 Jul 2013 01:13|
Actions (login required)
|Archive Repository Staff Only|