Wagner, Lynn and Druckman, Daniel (2010) Procedural justice, problem solving, and negotiation outcomes. In: 23rd Annual International Association for Conflict Management Conference (IACM 2010), 24-27 Jun 2010, Boston, Massachusetts.
|HTML Citation||EndNote||Dublin Core||Reference Manager|
Full text available as:
|PDF (Published Version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
[Abstract]: Building on content analysis of negotiator statements that compared the process and outcome in multiple international, intergovernmental negotiations, this study further assesses the existence of procedural justice in eleven negotiations, to compare three categories of variables: process, procedural justice and outcome. The research asks whether procedural justice, problem solving processes and integrative outcomes are correlated, and whether procedural justice is a mediating influence between the other two variables. In addition, duration of the agreement was included as a fourth variable for some analyses. A question of interest is whether procedural justice also mediates the relationship between problem solving and duration.
|Item Type:||Conference or Workshop Item (Commonwealth Reporting Category E) (Paper)|
|Additional Information:||No evidence of copyright restrictions.|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||mediation; dispute resolution; negotiation; case studies; problem solving; agreements|
|Fields of Research (FOR2008):||16 Studies in Human Society > 1606 Political Science > 160607 International Relations|
22 Philosophy and Religious Studies > 2201 Applied Ethics > 220104 Human Rights and Justice Issues
18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180102 Access to Justice
|Socio-Economic Objective (SEO2008):||C Society > 94 Law, Politics and Community Services > 9403 International Relations > 940399 International Relations not elsewhere classified|
|Deposited On:||06 Jun 2011 16:12|
|Last Modified:||27 Feb 2012 17:36|
Archive Staff Only: edit this record