McNickle, Don and Addie, Ron (2007) Comparing different approaches to the use of DiffServ in the internet. In: TENCON 2005: IEEE Annual International Region 10 Conference, 21-24 Nov 2005, Melbourne, Australia.
|HTML Citation||EndNote||Dublin Core||Reference Manager|
Full text not available from this archive.
Identification Number or DOI: doi: 10.1109/TENCON.2005.301038
The existing Internet appears to provide good quality service for a very wide range of services, possibly because the TCP protocols aim to achieve fair queueing, or processor sharing. The DiffServ architecture aims to do better than this by providing different performance standards for different classes of service. The natural way to apply DiffServ is to allocate classes in accordance with the urgency or priority of the requests. However,another approach is to use DiffServ to allocate service classes according to the 'size' of the requests, where the concept of 'size' can be defined in a variety of ways: total bytes in a flow, rate of a flow, or by a series of token buckets. We use simple queueing models to investigate how much improvement in performance could be obtained by implementing this service discipline, and whether, as a consequence, it is unnecessary and perhaps even dangerous to assign classes of service in accordance with the type of service requested. The results suggest that shortest job first offers considerable advantages over processor sharing. Thus in spite of the difficulties of identifying the size of flows it may be worthwhile to consider how something like shortest job first can be implemented. On the other hand it appears that other priority queue strategies, not based on job size, are risky, in that the marginal advantages gained by favoured jobs are very small, and the majority of jobs can expect to suffer worse response times.
|Item Type:||Conference or Workshop Item (Commonwealth Reporting Category E) (Paper)|
|Additional Information:||Deposited in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder. Copyright 2005 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||differential service; internet architectures; delay; Diffserv networks; protocols; quality management; tagging; web and internet services|
|Fields of Research (FOR2008):||08 Information and Computing Sciences > 0805 Distributed Computing > 080503 Networking and Communications|
08 Information and Computing Sciences > 0805 Distributed Computing > 080505 Web Technologies (excl. Web Search)
15 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services > 1503 Business and Management > 150313 Quality Management
|Subjects:||280000 Information, Computing and Communication Sciences|
|Socio-Economic Objective (SEO2008):||E Expanding Knowledge > 97 Expanding Knowledge > 970108 Expanding Knowledge in the Information and Computing Sciences|
|Deposited On:||11 Oct 2007 10:16|
|Last Modified:||07 Mar 2012 15:21|
Archive Staff Only: edit this record