Hemming, Andrew (2009) Is defamation the 'Galapagos Islands Division' of the Australian law of torts? University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review , 11 . pp. 84-101. ISSN 1441-9769
|HTML Citation||EndNote||Dublin Core||Reference Manager|
Full text not available from this archive.
The theme of this article is whether in 2009 the tort of defamation can be accurately described as exhibiting in substantive form a species of tortious exotica in a postnational uniform defamation laws legal environment. The article examines this question through the prism of three recent defamation cases that went to the High Court and through an analysis of the new uniform defamation legislation itself which preserves much of the previous common law. In light of the newly minted legislation and the lack of Australian cases on the important offer of amends procedure, attention is given to the recent case law experience in England under a similar offer of amends procedure. The article concludes that conjuring up images of giant turtles and arcane procedures in relation to defamation is to indulge in hyperbole and gives insufficient credit to the landmark uniform defamation laws.
|Item Type:||Article (Commonwealth Reporting Category C)|
|Additional Information:||Author version not held.|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||defamation; Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Manock|
|Fields of Research (FOR2008):||18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180126 Tort Law|
18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180122 Legal Theory, Jurisprudence and Legal Interpretation
18 Law and Legal Studies > 1801 Law > 180119 Law and Society
|Socio-Economic Objective (SEO2008):||E Expanding Knowledge > 97 Expanding Knowledge > 970118 Expanding Knowledge in Law and Legal Studies|
|Deposited On:||25 Feb 2011 17:34|
|Last Modified:||15 Aug 2012 11:56|
Archive Staff Only: edit this record